European equities enter the second half of 2026 with an unusually divided outlook. Economic momentum has improved, earnings forecasts are being upgraded, fiscal spending on defence and infrastructure offers a multi-year tailwind, and valuations remain substantially below Wall Street.
Yet a 19 July strategy note from Bank of America argues that precisely because so much good news is now embedded in prices, European shares have become vulnerable to disappointment. Its strategists see scope for a decline of more than 5% by early Q4, warning that record-high expected profit margins and one of the lowest equity risk premiums in two decades leave little margin for error.
The debate for UK retail investors, therefore, is less about whether Europe should be owned at all and more about how much exposure to take, and where within Europe the best risk/reward now lies.
Bank of America’s warning: good news may already be priced in
BofA’s central argument is that improving fundamentals do not automatically mean attractive prospective returns.
Global economic data have recently surprised positively, European growth has improved as inflation pressures eased, and investors have become more confident about corporate profits. But BofA believes markets have already discounted much of this.
Most strikingly, consensus European corporate profit-margin expectations are at record highs, while the equity risk premium is close to its lowest level in around 20 years. In simple terms, investors are expecting companies to deliver unusually strong profitability while demanding relatively little additional compensation for owning risky equities rather than safer assets.
That creates an asymmetric setup:
Good earnings may simply validate current prices; disappointing earnings could cause a much larger reaction.
The European equity debate at a glance
| Indicator/theme | Current signal | Bull interpretation | Bear interpretation |
| STOXX Europe 600 | ~641 | Close to records reflects improving fundamentals | Much optimism already priced in |
| 2026 STOXX 600 EPS growth | ~14–15% consensus | Strong earnings recovery | Energy significantly inflates headline growth |
| Q2 EPS growth forecast | 15.3% | Strong reporting season possible | Only 6.0% ex-energy |
| Europe vs S&P 500 valuation | ~26% PE discount | Europe remains relatively cheap | Discount partly reflects structurally slower growth |
| Profit-margin expectations | Record/highly elevated | Operating leverage could drive EPS | Little room for disappointment |
| Equity risk premium | Near 20-year lows, per BofA | Investors see reduced macro risk | Poor compensation for equity risk |
| Earnings revisions | Strongest since 2021, per Citi | Earnings momentum broadening | Could be approaching a cyclical peak |
| Fiscal spending | Rising defence/infrastructure investment | Multi-year industrial stimulus | Slow implementation could disappoint |
| Key BofA tactical call | >5% downside by early Q4 | Potential future buying opportunity | Near-term risk/reward unattractive |
Figures are approximate and based on analyst/LSEG data available in July 2026; forecasts can change rapidly.
Why BofA sees an uncomfortable risk/reward
EUROPEAN EQUITIES — JULY 2026
POSITIVE FUNDAMENTALS PRICING RISK
───────────────────── ────────────
Improving economic data ───────► Near-record equity markets
Strong EPS forecasts ───────► Record margin expectations
Broad earnings upgrades ───────► Low equity risk premium
Fiscal stimulus ───────► High expectations already priced
AI / infrastructure demand ───────► Capex sustainability risk
BofA’s concern:
┌─────────────────────────────┐
│ LESS ROOM FOR GOOD SURPRISE │
│ MORE ROOM FOR DISAPPOINTMENT│
└─────────────────────────────┘
Three risks behind BofA’s caution
The first is earnings expectations.
Headline numbers look impressive. LSEG IBES data in early July suggested STOXX 600 companies could produce 15.3% year-on-year Q2 earnings growth. But strip out energy and expected growth falls sharply to 6.0%. Revenue growth similarly drops from 10.5% overall to just 3.9% excluding energy.
This distinction matters. A commodity-driven earnings rebound is very different from broad-based organic growth.
The second risk is the AI investment cycle. BofA notes that expected 12-month capital expenditure by US hyperscalers has surged from below $300 billion in early 2025 to more than $800 billion. European beneficiaries include semiconductor equipment, electrification and industrial automation companies.
But if hyperscalers begin questioning returns on that enormous investment, European companies sitting downstream of AI capex could suffer. BofA therefore remains underweight semiconductors and capital goods.
The third is energy and geopolitical risk. Europe remains more vulnerable than the US to an energy shock. BofA’s base case assumes Brent falls below $80 by year-end, but prolonged Middle East disruption could push oil above $100. Higher energy prices would squeeze consumers, margins and inflation simultaneously.
Its preferred positioning is correspondingly defensive: food & beverages, pharmaceuticals and telecoms overweight; semiconductors, capital goods and banks underweight.
But Citi sees something very different: an earnings upgrade wave
The strongest counterargument comes from Citi.
Citi’s Europe ex-UK Earnings Revisions Index recently reached its highest level since 2021 and close to its highest reading since the series began in 1999. More importantly, upgrades are becoming broader rather than remaining concentrated in technology and commodities.
Around 80% of continental European sectors are now in net earnings-upgrade territory. Citi says similar historical conditions have generally been followed by further increases in 12-month forward EPS estimates and favourable equity performance.
That creates a fascinating disagreement.
BofA vs Citi: same data, different conclusion
| Bank of America | Citi | |
| Earnings expectations | Too elevated | Supported by accelerating revisions |
| Margins | Expectations dangerously high | Earnings breadth is improving |
| Valuation/risk premium | Insufficient compensation for risk | EPS growth can support valuations |
| Economic recovery | Largely priced in | Fiscal and cyclical recovery still developing |
| Preferred style | Defensive | More constructive/balanced |
| Near-term outlook | >5% downside possible | Constructive |
| Main question | What if expectations disappoint? | What if upgrades continue? |
Citi’s original 2026 outlook anticipated around 11% EPS growth, with fiscal stimulus, a cyclical pickup and broader AI participation supporting European markets, while acknowledging demanding valuations and the need for companies to deliver earnings.
Its more recent earnings-revision evidence strengthens that bull case.
There is one important caveat: Citi itself notes that extremely strong earnings-revision readings can sometimes act as a contrarian signal, and historically they have not consistently led Europe to outperform global equities.
UBS has become considerably more bullish
UBS has also moved in the opposite direction to BofA.
The investment bank recently raised its STOXX 600 year-end target to 690 for 2026, from 630 previously, and set a 2027 target of 760.
Its reasoning is that European earnings are proving more resilient and broader than expected: AI-related upgrades have strengthened, banks continue to see positive revisions, and previously weak defensive sectors are improving.
UBS believes that combination can support more than 10% earnings growth and a valuation of around 16 times earnings.
That target would imply meaningful upside from the STOXX 600’s roughly 641 level on 21 July.
So, the disagreement can essentially be reduced to one variable:
BofA thinks investors are paying too much for optimistic expectations. UBS and Citi think earnings are increasingly capable of delivering those expectations.
Europe’s strongest structural bull case: fiscal spending
There is also a longer-term argument that may be more important than the next quarter’s earnings.
Europe is undergoing a significant fiscal shift towards defence, infrastructure, energy security and industrial investment.
Germany’s infrastructure and defence programmes, broader NATO spending commitments and EU initiatives could create years of demand for industrial equipment, construction, electrical infrastructure, defence systems and power networks.
BlackRock highlights energy and infrastructure as important equity opportunities, while noting that European defence spending was already accelerating before the latest geopolitical escalation. The European Commission has outlined ambitions to mobilise up to €800 billion related to defence investment.
BlackRock mid-ear 2026 outlooks
This makes Europe structurally different from the US market.
US EQUITY MARKET EUROPEAN EQUITY MARKET
AI platforms Industrials
Software Banks
Semiconductors Defence
Mega-cap technology Luxury
Digital advertising Healthcare
Cloud Energy/Utilities/Infrastructure
Growth-led Value/cyclical-led
Highly concentrated More diversified
Higher valuation Lower valuation
Higher EPS growth Greater fiscal sensitivity
For a UK investor already heavily exposed to US mega-cap technology through a global tracker, European equities can therefore provide genuine sector diversification, rather than simply another geographical label.
The valuation opportunity is still real
Despite Europe’s strong run, the valuation gap with America remains substantial.
LSEG data cited by Reuters recently put the STOXX 600 at roughly a 26% valuation discount to the S&P 500.
That is attractive—but investors should avoid interpreting ‘cheaper’ as automatically meaning ‘better value.’
Why Europe trades more cheaply
The S&P 500 contains exceptionally profitable, asset-light global technology franchises capable of generating high returns on capital and sustained earnings growth.
Europe has much larger weightings in banks, industrials, autos, commodities and mature consumer businesses.
Consequently, part of Europe’s discount is structural.
The earnings gap remains significant: LSEG forecasts cited in early July suggested S&P 500 earnings growth of 24.5% in 2026 versus 14.3% for Europe, followed by 18.1% versus 11.9% respectively in 2027.
2026 consensus EPS growth
S&P 500 ████████████████████████ ~24.5%
STOXX 600 ██████████████ ~14.3%
Growth advantage: US
Valuation advantage: Europe
The investment case therefore depends on whether investors are being adequately compensated by the valuation discount for Europe’s slower structural growth.
Where Europe offers opportunities
Rather than treating Europe as a single trade, UK investors may find the strongest case in several distinct themes.
Defence and aerospace have powerful multi-year order books driven by structurally higher European military spending. The danger is valuation: many obvious beneficiaries have already rerated dramatically.
Banks have benefited from higher interest rates, improving profitability, capital returns and consolidation potential. European bank earnings remain healthy, with Goldman Sachs recently forecasting an 11% year-on-year increase in pretax profits for major lenders during the upcoming reporting cycle. But the EURO STOXX Banks index has already doubled over roughly two years, reducing the margin of safety.
Industrials, electrification and infrastructure offer exposure to defence, grid upgrades, automation, data centres and German fiscal stimulus. These could be among Europe’s best long-term structural opportunities, although BofA’s caution on capital goods illustrates how much optimism is already reflected in some valuations.
Healthcare offers a more defensive route. Europe contains globally competitive pharmaceutical and medical technology businesses with revenues that are less dependent on European GDP.
Luxury and consumer brands provide exposure to global wealth and Asian consumption rather than purely European economic growth—but remain sensitive to China.
Small and mid-caps could eventually benefit disproportionately from lower financing costs and stronger domestic European activity, particularly if fiscal stimulus translates into real orders and investment.
Pros and cons of European exposure for UK investors
| Advantages | Risks |
| Valuation discount to US equities | Lower structural earnings growth than US |
| Reduces dependence on US mega-cap tech | Many European indices lack high-growth technology |
| Exposure to defence/infrastructure spending | Fiscal spending may take years to reach earnings |
| Strong industrial and engineering franchises | Cyclical sensitivity |
| Attractive healthcare and luxury leaders | China exposure in luxury/industrial sectors |
| Potential beneficiary of stronger domestic investment | Energy-import dependence |
| Earnings revisions currently improving | Expectations may already be too optimistic |
| Diversifies sterling-based portfolios | EUR/GBP and other currency movements affect returns |
| Less concentrated than S&P 500 | Structural productivity/demographic challenges |
What should UK retail investors do?
The evidence does not support an all-or-nothing call on Europe.
For most long-term UK retail investors, the strongest approach is to maintain meaningful European exposure but resist aggressively chasing the market after its rerating.
A global equity tracker already provides European exposure, although considerably less than the US. Investors using a market-cap weighted global portfolio therefore do not necessarily need a separate European fund.
Sharesify podcast with Jack Featherby of JPMorgan European Discovery Trust
The more interesting decision arises for investors who are heavily tilted towards either UK equities or US technology.
For those portfolios, adding continental Europe can improve diversification significantly.
Illustrative positioning framework
| Investor profile | Possible approach to Europe* | Rationale |
| Global tracker investor | Market-weight exposure | Already diversified; no need to make a tactical call |
| US/tech-heavy investor | Modest Europe overweight | Adds industrials, banks, healthcare and defence |
| UK-heavy investor | Increase global diversification including Europe | Reduces UK-specific sector/home bias |
| Income investor | Neutral/modest overweight | European dividends and financials can complement UK income |
| Aggressive growth investor | Neutral/underweight | US/Asia still offer stronger structural growth |
| Value investor | Selective overweight | Relative valuations remain attractive |
| Cautious investor today | Phase purchases over 6–12 months | BofA’s valuation/risk-premium warning argues against chasing |
*Illustrative asset-allocation considerations, not personalised financial advice.
Investor verdict
European equities enter the second half of 2026 with an unusually divided outlook and Bank of America’s warning deserves attention because the European bull case is no longer undiscovered.
Markets have already rerated, profit-margin expectations are exceptionally high and investors are accepting a historically thin premium for equity risk. A disappointing earnings season, renewed energy shock or slowdown in AI capital spending could therefore produce the 5%-plus correction BofA anticipates.
But the bearish argument should not obscure genuine improvements underneath the market.
Citi’s earnings-revision indicator is close to historic highs, with upgrades spreading across roughly 80% of continental European sectors. UBS has substantially increased its STOXX 600 target. Fiscal spending on defence, infrastructure and energy security represents a potentially multi-year investment cycle. And Europe still trades at a sizeable discount to the US.
The most sensible conclusion for UK retail investors is therefore strategically constructive but tactically selective.
EUROPE INVESTMENT SCORECARD
Valuation ████████░░ ATTRACTIVE
Earnings momentum ████████░░ STRONG
Fiscal tailwinds █████████░ STRONG
Diversification █████████░ STRONG
Economic growth █████░░░░░ MODERATE
Margin of safety ████░░░░░░ WEAKENING
Near-term risk/reward █████░░░░░ BALANCED
Long-term opportunity ████████░░ ATTRACTIVE
High-quality companies
For investors building portfolios today, Europe arguably deserves a full strategic allocation rather than a wholesale overweight. New money could sensibly be phased in rather than committed after strong rallies, with an emphasis on, crucially, identifying high-quality companies with sustainable advantages benefiting from structural investment rather than simply buying yesterday’s winners.
The crucial distinction is between Europe being cheaper than America and Europe being cheap in absolute terms. BofA’s warning suggests the second proposition is becoming harder to defend.
For UK investors already heavily exposed to the FTSE and US mega-cap technology, however, European equities still provide something valuable: a different earnings engine—industrials, healthcare, infrastructure, financials and defence—at lower headline valuations. That diversification may ultimately be a stronger reason to own Europe than trying to predict whether the STOXX 600 rises or falls 5% over the next three months.
You might also like:
